The launch of the book Britain’s Black Debt by historian Hilary Beckles, Principal of the Cave Hill Campus on May 2 was as solemn and grand an event as the weight of reparations from Britain for the crime of slavery demanded. The auditorium of the New Medical Sciences Building on the Mona Campus of the University was full, with ushers politely showing attendees to their seats. Here and there you could see clumps of Rastafarians equipped with small drums and instruments which they shook and beat whenever a speaker said something they approved of.
Kellie Magnus @kelliemagnus
Beckles: 300 years of salt pork has led to chronic illnesses. Rasta man shouts out: fire bun!@chicab_1
@kelliemagnus I find huge flags waved at high speeds right by the ear more dramatic #strategiestosurvive3hourbooklaunchKellie Magnus @kelliemagnus
Gonsalves calls for intl conference on reparations. Offers St Vincent and the Grenadines as host #britainsblackdebtanniepaul @anniepaul
Sigh RT @kelliemagnus: After 67 minutes Gonsalves says, “I turn now to part two of the book.” #britainsblackdebtRT @keimiller: Gonzales has moved on to 2nd topic: slavery. Hope its not as long as Roots.
@touchofallright to @BigBlackBarry
dude–you shld be at this launch for “britain’s black debt: reparations for caribbean slavery and native genocide”
BigBlackBarry @BigBlackBarry
@touchofallright nobody doan invite me to these jiggy functions. How it can name black an Barry nat dere?
The flippancy of the tweets I’ve chosen to quote above are no reflection on the subject of the book itself but more the outcome of a captive audience equipped with social media and able to chafe publicly at the undue length of the ceremonies. Lord Anthony Gifford who has researched the subject of reparations extensively and campaigned for it, was short and incisive but by the time the guest speaker, the Honorable Ralph Gonsalves, Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, finished his expansive official speech many of us had to leave without hearing the author of the book respond. This was a pity because I had come mainly to hear Beckles on a subject that I’ve thought and written about myself.
In fact the event reminded me that one of the earliest columns I wrote for the Sunday Herald (March 10, 1996) was titled The Logic of Reparation. I remember being stunned at the time when Rupert Lewis congratulated me on being the first columnist to tackle this troublesome issue in the mainstream media (Jamaica’s come a long way since the mid-nineties). My own interest in Reparations was sparked by my conversations with a family friend, Ras Makonnen, aka George Nelson, a feisty Rastafarian public figure who had he not succumbed to cancer would probably have been Mayor of Portmore today. Big George as he was known, founded the Committee on Reparations in Jamaica in 1991 and had attended the First Pan-African Conference on Reparations held in Abuja, Nigeria, April 27-29, 1993, out of which came the Abuja Proclamation, part of which i quote below.
…Fully persuaded that the damage sustained by the African peoples is not a “thing of the past’ but is Painfully manifest in the damaged lives of contemporary Africans from Harlem to Harare, in the damaged economies of the Black World from Guinea to Guyana, from Somalia to Surinam.Respectfully aware of historic precedents in reparations, ranging from German Payment of restitution to the Jews for the enormous tragedy of the Nazi Holocaust to the question of compensating Japanese-Americans for injustice of internment by Roosevelt Administration in the United States during the World War II.Cognizant of the fact that compensation for injustice need not necessarily be paid only in capital but could include service to the victims or other forms of restitution and readjustment of the relationship agreeable to both parties.Emphatically convinced that what matters is not the guilt but the responsibility of those states and nations whose economic evolution once depended on slave labor and colonialism, and whose forebears participated either in selling and buying Africans, or in owning them, or in colonizing them…
“This is arguably a main point of the Reparation advocacy – by no means seeking a hand-out of 500 pounds sterling per person to descendants of the oppressed but rather positing serious investment by countries which have been enriched by the heinous crime of the Slave Trade and Slavery, in the human resource development of countries that suffered, preferably through the education and preparation of their young to enable them to cope with the inheritance of a continuing unjust world.” – Rex Nettleford (http://www.un.org/events/slaveryabolition/rn_statement.html)
Precisely. Thanks Erin…
Yes, and check out the film Traces of the Trade, in which a young white seminary student takes her family back to Cuba and West Africa to retrace her great grandfather’s steps (or great great) who was the largest slave trader on the east coast. The most important point of this film is that because this was THE economic system and wealth generator at the time, no one was exempt, whether they owned or traded slaves or not. Anyone who put money in a bank or bought something from a store in Bristol, Rhode Island, where she is from, was supporting the slave trade because all these businesses invested in it through shipping companies. No one is outside this history or this system…it is the foundational reality of the New World…
Thanks Deb, will look out for the film…yes valuable point that people don’t realize fully how slavery undergirded the entire economic system…
I don’t think the individual handouts makes any sense, but do like the idea of solid and meaningful investments that would truly benefit ALL Jamaicans. Makes perfect sense. I followed the tweets and was impressed by your patience and endurance but sorry you missed comments by the writer of the book himself! Seems rather ill-mannered to make such a long speech when it’s not even your book.
So we have all thought, written and spoken on this topic now for years. What is the next step? Did Lord Gifford have any suggestions? Or is it going to remain an academic topic forever? Any traction in the triple-dip-recession UK, really, on this?
Annie, I clearly failed miserably in my effort to educate Jamaicans on Reparations, on returning from the 2001 UN WCAR on Reparations and setting up the Jamaica Reparations Movement (JaRM). The enormity of the task and the lack of support from the population, has led me to see this as an almost-impossible objective to achieve, given the enormous ramifications of sharing guilt and blame, not only to Britain and other European nations, but also to Africa also. However, the WCAR made 19 recommendations of ways in which Reparations should be given, which delegates hoped would answer the question: WHAT NEXT? We could begin here.
UN W.C.A.R. 2001 DECLARATION – FORMS OF REPARATIONS
THE JAMAICA REPARATIONS MOVMEMENT THEREFORE SETS FORTH ITS CLAIM FOR JAMAICAN REPARATIONS GUIDED, BY THE UN WCAR FINAL DECLARATION UNDER THE HEADING:
IV. PROVISION OF EFFECTIVE REMEDIES, RECOURSE, REDRESS, AND OTHER MEASURES AT THE NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELS (Para)158. …The conference recognizes the need to develop programmes for the social and economic development of these societies and the Diaspora, within the framework of a new partnership based on the spirit of solidarity and mutual respect, in the following areas:
• Debt Relief
• Poverty Eradication
• Building or strengthening democratic institutions
• Promotion of foreign direct investment
• Market access
• Intensify efforts to meet the international agreed targets for Official Development Assistance (ODA) transfers to developing countries
• New Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) bridging the digital divide
• Agriculture and food security
• Transfer of technology
• Transparent and accountable governance
• Investment in health infrastructure in tackling HIV/AIDS, TV and malaria, including among others through the Global AIDS and Health Fund
• Infrastructure development
• Human resource development including capacity building
• Education, training and cultural development
• Mutual legal assistance in the repatriation of illegally obtained and illegally transferred (stashed) funds in accordance with national and international instruments
• Illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons
• Restitution of art objects, historical artifacts and documents to their countries of origin in accordance with bilateral agreements or international instruments
• Trafficking in persons, particularly women and children
• Facilitation of welcomed return and resettlement of the descendants of enslaved Africans
Brilliant, thanks Barbara! This is a fantastic list. I don’t think you failed miserably!! 2001 seems so long ago now, though. I hope the process is moving forward.